“What I think, collectively as industry, government, society, we need to be very cautious about is ensuring that we bring the right balance to environmental improvements with continued oil supply,” Corson said. The company shares the government’s objective of getting to net-zero emissions by 2050, he added.
Trudeau’s government issued the target in March and followed it with a discussion paper on a potential emissions cap on the energy sector. The latter could be implemented through a tougher carbon-price policy or a cap-and-trade system that allows higher-emitting companies to buy credits from lower-emitting ones.
The 42% objective is larger than the Canadian oil industry’s own proposal to cut emissions by 30% by the end of the decade — a plan that relies heavily on carbon-capture technology to reduce pollution from the oil sands, which has a higher carbon footprint than many other forms of crude extraction.
“We have a plan and we think it’s one of the few plans out there,” MEG Energy Corp. CEO Derek Evans told analysts. “It’s ambitious at 30%. I don’t know how we get to 42%. I think that personally, in my humble opinion, is almost unrealistic.”
The government said that with profits soaring, oil companies have the money to invest in technology.
“Our emissions reduction plan looks at every sector and every region to help reduce our emissions, in a way that is affordable and creates new economic opportunities,” Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault said in an emailed statement. “With the sector reporting windfall profits across the board, now is the time to invest in decarbonization for the health of the planet and the sustainability of the industry.”
The desire for emissions reductions must be balanced with the need to supply fuel to the world during a time of high prices, Cenovus Energy Inc. CEO Alex Pourbaix said in an investor call Thursday.
“Ultimately, the risk could be a cut in production from Canada at a time when these resources are just incredibly, desperately needed worldwide,” he said.