Sign Up for FREE Daily Energy News
  • Stay Connected
  • linkedin
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • youtube2

Vista Projects
Copper Tip Energy Services
Copper Tip Energy
Vista Projects

Trump bets on new European LNG terminals but EU funds meager

These translations are done via Google Translate

July 31, 2018, by Oleg Vukmanovic and Sabina Zawadzki

LONDON (Reuters) – U.S. President Donald Trump expects the European Union to fund 9 to 11 liquefied natural gas (LNG) ports to absorb “vastly” more shipments from the United States but current EU investment in new projects will only help open small markets.

In a White House press conference with Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte late on Monday, Trump said part of the U.S.-EU trade talks sought to expand America’s reach into the continent’s gas markets which were awash in Russian supply.

“And we are already talking to the European Union about building anywhere from 9 to 11 ports, which they will pay for, so that we can ship our LNG over to various parts of Europe,” he said.

The comments follow trade talks with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker last week where Trump said the EU would purchase “vast amounts” of U.S. LNG. Juncker said Europe would build more terminals to handle the influx.

Responding to Trump’s latest statements, the European Commission told Reuters on Tuesday that bilateral talks helped cement 278 million euros ($325 million) in EU funding earmarked for LNG import projects in Croatia, Greece and Cyprus. They are due onstream between 2018 and 2020.

But the projects under consideration for EU funds pre-date the Trump administration and are being developed mostly by private companies over which politicians have limited sway.

On top of that, three-quarters of Europe’s existing LNG import capacity lies idle and the new terminals being mulled in niche markets such as Croatia, Greece and Cyprus represent a fraction of the continent’s overall capacity.

Croatia’s plans have been dogged by delays for at least a decade and the east Mediterranean’s rich gas deposits offer a potential alternative to LNG for Cyprus.

The EU is supporting 14 LNG infrastructure projects in total which could increase import capacity by 15 billion cubic meters (Bcm) of gas by 2021, compared to the continent’s existing 210 Bcm LNG import capacity.

However, the 14 infrastructure projects are not all LNG import terminals. Some are pipelines linking terminals to inland centers of demand.


ROO.AI Oil and Gas Field Service Software

Europe has little need for U.S. LNG now as Russian piped gas surges into the continent’s gas markets at a record pace.

“In 2017 the average utilization of these terminals was 26 percent – leaving ample margin for more imports from the US if competitively priced,” the Commission said.

Yet competitive pricing is the biggest problem facing U.S. LNG in Europe. The most lucrative markets for U.S. LNG are in South and Central America, India and the Far East, with Europe near the bottom of the list given its relatively low prices and ample supplies from Russia and Norway.

This could change dramatically though as American output soars in coming years and as domestic production from the North Sea and Norway shrinks, leaving a growing gap to be filled by external suppliers.

In a showdown, most analysts believe Russia can undercut U.S. LNG but in practice the producer has avoided flooding the EU by selling its gas below market prices, opting instead to achieve the best return.

There are limits to the growth of Russian gas in Europe.

True, state-run Gazprom has spare pipeline capacity via Ukraine and Belarus to boost exports further.

But plans to build new routes into Europe, such as Nord Stream II, face stiff political opposition which could constrain its longer-term growth.

At a NATO summit this month, Trump said Germany was “captive” to Russia for backing an expanded gas import corridor along the Baltic seabed, known as Nord Stream II, into the country’s north east.

Gazprom may also voluntarily seek to limit its European gas market share below 40 percent in order to avoid attracting scrutiny from competition regulators, Thierry Bros, Senior Research Fellow at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, said.

Additional reporting by Roberta Rampton in WASHINGTON and Alissa de Carbonnel in BRUSSELS, editing by Clive McKeef

Share This:

More News Articles