Multiple companies have now had solar components detained at U.S. ports in the aftermath of a Biden administration ban on equipment that may have used raw materials originally from Hoshine Silicon Industry Co., according to people familiar with the situation who asked for anonymity while discussing sensitive trade issues.
The seizures come amid a new push by some U.S. solar manufacturers to extend tariffs to China-linked factories in Vietnam, Malaysia and Thailand, the U.S.’s largest panel suppliers. Together the developments threaten to disrupt the U.S. solar market, potentially jeopardizing Biden’s goal of a carbon-free power sector by 2035.
“The disruptive and harmful impact of new trade petitions and Customs and Border Protection enforcement action cannot be understated,” Solar Energy Industries Association President Abigail Ross Hopper said in an email to members hours after the petitions were filed. “The disruption to the U.S. solar market could be severe.”
Solar developers now are scrambling to prove incoming goods — some of which may have been ordered months before the Biden ban — are free of Hoshine material. A major solar-panel maker warned this week that all imports from China risk being detained by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
The Biden administration’s order is part of efforts to confront alleged human-rights abuses in the Xinjiang region. China denies the allegations, which it claims are an attempt to undermine successful businesses.
Hoshine is the world’s largest manufacturer of metallurgical silicon, which is refined into polysilicon, the key material in solar panels. The material is so many steps removed from completed panels that just about any module coming to the U.S. can’t yet prove it doesn’t contain Hoshine material, Philip Shen, an analyst at Roth Capital Partners, said in a research note.
In some respects, there has never been a brighter moment for solar power in the U.S. Installations are booming, and Biden appeared poised to deliver the most progressive climate presidency in history — on the heels of an administration steadfast on boosting fossil fuels. And yet, the industry’s supply chain has been battered by higher costs, including for modules and freight.
Solar panels already cost about 40% more in the U.S. than the rest of the world, and expanded tariffs could lift prices further, according to Jenny Chase, BloombergNEF’s head of global solar research. “U.S. companies that develop and build projects would certainly suffer in the short term as U.S. module prices would go even higher,” she said.
While developers may be hurt, any moves that make imports more expensive would help level the playing field for companies that want to manufacture solar equipment on U.S. soil. That would be a boost to another part of Biden’s agenda — union jobs.
“Trade actions against imported solar products may counter President Biden’s climate agenda,” Timothy Fox, a vice president of ClearView Energy Partners, said in an interview. “But they also could further his union and domestic manufacturing agenda.”
A spokesman for the White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the matter.
Canadian Solar Inc. said that four of its sample modules shipped from China to its U.S. office were held last week by officials due to a sourcing issue, and that all Chinese shipments were at risk of being stopped at the border.
Other companies have also been affected, with multiple containers seized at different ports, according to people familiar with the actions. The cost of having products detained at U.S. Customs facilities is prohibitive, making other companies question whether it’s worth the risk of trying to import to the U.S., one of the people said.
China-based module suppliers LONGi Green Energy Technology Co., Trina Solar Co. and JinkoSolar Holding Co. declined to comment, while JA Solar Technology Co. and the China Photovoltaic Industry Association didn’t respond to requests for comment. LONGi declined 3.6% in China trading Wednesday.
The American Clean Power Association, which represents renewable power developers, said it is firmly against any forced labor practices, but warned that “responsible enforcement” is critical for meeting climate targets, as developers pursue a 40 gigawatt pipeline of solar power projects.
“Recent enforcement actions and international trade petitions go beyond the intended goal and risk significantly impacting U.S. solar deployment,” Chief Executive Heather Zichal said by email.
Amid the seizures, a group called the American Solar Manufacturers Against Chinese Circumvention on Monday filed petitions with the Commerce Department seeking to extend tariffs to factories run by Chinese firms out of the three Southeast Asian countries. The group hasn’t identified its members, and First Solar Inc., the largest U.S.-based manufacturer, declined to say whether it’s part of the consortium.
The filings come at a time when some domestic solar manufacturers are seeking an extension of former President Donald Trump’s solar tariffs — and as Democrats advance a $3.5 trillion tax-and-spending plan that could benefit both solar developers and clean-energy manufacturers.
While a surge of inexpensive imported panels could make it cheaper to deploy solar power in the U.S. — and help meet Biden’s clean energy targets — it could also come at the expense of organized labor and working families. And Biden’s renewable goals don’t automatically trump those concerns.
“It is not and never has been as simple as to say ‘Biden wants renewable energy,’” Height Capital Markets analyst Benjamin Salisbury said. “The Biden agenda is not to reduce domestic union employment and increase Chinese production.”