New Air Pollution Rules Could Reduce US Electric-Sector CO2 Emissions By More Than 4 Percent
January 4, 2012 By Jesse Jenkins and Alex Trembath
Two new federal air pollution regulations are expected to spur the closure of up to 67 aging, inefficient, coal-fired power plants, reducing both harmful air pollutants and emissions of the climate destabilizing greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide (CO2), according to an AP survey of US power plant operators and a preliminary Breakthrough Institute analysis of the likely impacts on CO2 emissions.
According to the AP survey, 31 coal-fired electricity generating units at power plants in a dozen states are expected to close rather than face costly upgrades to comply with a pair of new EPA regulations designed to curb emissions of smog-forming pollutants and toxic smoke stack emissions. These units have a combined nameplate capacity of 12,545 megawatts.*
Up to 36 additional coal-fired units with a combined 11,290 megawatts of capacity may also decide to close, as the costs of compliance with the EPA's recently enacted Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, designed to curb air pollution in states downwind from coal-fired power stations, and the new Mercury and Air Toxics Ruleannounced this week both take effect.
While the purpose of these regulations is to reduce harmful pollutants and improve public health, closure of these aging plants will also lead to a 1.1 to 4.2 percent reduction in US electric power sector emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), according to an analysis completed by the Breakthrough Institute. These air pollution regulations are thus a prime example of the ongoing success of pragmatic, "oblique" strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
We estimate that the 31 coal-fired generating units most likely to close in response to the new pollution regulations are responsible for more than 44 million metric tons of CO2 emissions annually, or 1.9 percent of US power sector CO2 emissions in 2010 and 0.8 percent of all US CO2 emissions (see tables below for details). Total CO2 reductions could reach 95.3 million metric tons if the additional 36 coal units at risk of closure also decide to retire.
If these shuttered, fossil-fueled generating units are replaced by zero-emissions renewable or nuclear power plants, total US power sector CO2 emissions would fall by up to 4.2 percent from 2010 levels (equivalent to a 1.7 percent reduction in total 2010 US CO2 emissions).
The net reduction in CO2 emissions would be reduced if closing coal-fired plants are replaced instead by generation from natural gas power plants, which are expected to significantly increase their share of US electricity generation in the coming years. Electricity generated by a natural gas combined-cycle power plant emits less than half the carbon dioxide as a typical coal-fired power plant. As such, we estimate that replacing all the retiring generation with electricity from gas-fired plants would reduce US power sector emissions between 1.1 and 2.4 percent, relative to 2010 levels, depending on the number of power plant closures. That would be the equivalent of a 0.5 to 0.8 percent reduction in total US CO2.
The new federal air pollution regulations are thus likely to indirectly result in modest but noticeable reductions in CO2 emissions, with the precise impact depending on the number of power plant closures and the replacement electricity sources.
As we argue along with our Hartwell Group colleagues in the July 2011 report, "Climate Pragmatism," these "oblique" pollution control measures can work to reduce both conventional pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions without relying on climate mitigation as the central justification.
The enforcement of this pair of new EPA air pollution rules is thus one small, successful example of the kind of "no regrets" pollution reduction policies that can achieve near-term reductions in carbon emissions.
31 coal-fired generating units are slated for closure as a result of the new EPA rules:
36 more coal-fired generating units are at risk of being shuttered due high mercury content:
*2006 emissions figures. Data: sourcewatch.org. All other data from Sierra Club Beyond Coal database.
**When AP and EIA data on capacity differed, we used EIA figures.
*Note: two additional gas-fired generating units with a total capacity of 129 MW also made the AP's list of likely closures (Fox Lake in MN and Anadarko in OK). These plants are excluded from this analysis however.
Note on methodology: these calculations are preliminary estimates based on available data for power plant CO2 emissions drawn from a variety of available sources. CO2 emissions data are available only at the power plant level. If a power plant has multiple generating units, we apportion CO2 emissions to the specific generating units expected to close based on their share of the power plant's total nameplate capacity. As different generating units operate at both different efficiencies and for differing amounts of time each year, this methodology may either somewhat under- or over-estimate the CO2 emissions associated with a given generating unit. More precise results would require obtaining data on heat-rates and capacity factors or annual generation for specific generating units at each multi-unit power plant. (Please contact [email protected] if you have access to additional data that could be used to refine this analysis.)
This is a cross-post from TheEnergyCollective.com.
The Energy Collective is the web's premier site for sophisticated energy policy discussion. TEC is an independent, moderated community of professionals focused on the complex challenges of meeting the world's energy needs sustainably.
Last Wednesday was a big milestone for people who care about public health and a livable climate. Two utilities announced the planned closure of nine coal plants.Read more ...
Today, in the UK, the world's oldest nuclear power plant shut down.Read more ...
The U.S. led the world in clean energy investment in 2011, but China retained the top spot in the latest Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index from Ernst & Young.Read more ...
- Climate Progress
- Dot Earth
- NY Times Green Blog
- NRDC Action Fund- The Mark Up
- Grist- David Roberts
- The Energy Collective
- Earth & Industry
- Green Tech- Martin LaMonica
- Mother Jones- Kate Sheppard
- The Daily Climate
- NRDC- Switchboard
- Miles Grant
- Climate Compass
- The Oil Drum
- Compete Coalition
- Climate 411
- EPA- Greenversations
- Taking the Initiative
- The Energy Fix
- The Heartland Institute
- The Energy Tribune
- Van Jones
- Aimee Christensen
- Amanda Little
- Mother Nature Network
- Energy Literacy
- The Heritage Foundation- Energy & Envrionment
- Green Chip Stocks
- Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
- Resources for the Future
- Josh Tickell
- Dan Weiss
- United Nations Foundation
- Global Green USA
- The Earth Institute
- The Rocky Mountain Institute Blog
- American Solutions- Energy
- Bipartisan Beat
- Green Business
- Growth Energy
- Earth Policy Institute
- Energy Strategist
- Coal Tattoo